Any team would be happy to have Davis in their line-up, especially when you consider that his 22nd birthday was just this past March, and he’s on-pace for 29 home runs in just over 300 plate appearances (in case you’re interested, he’s on pace for 58 home runs given a full 600 plate appearances, and about 67-68 home runs over 700 plate appearances. Not exactly sustainable rates, but impressive nonetheless). So why are the Rangers so conflicted? Well, it’s mostly because Hank Blalock is expected back from the DL just after the All-Star Break, and it’s hard to tell a 27 year old veteran who has been with the club for years that his spot has been taken by a hot hitting 22 year old rookie.
If you were in charge of the Rangers, what would you do? The overall consensus is that Davis will either take a seat on the bench while Blalock starts, or Davis will be sent back down to AAA until his services are needed later in the year, or even in 2009. He’s been solid at the plate as well as defensively, but can you really hand over the keys to a young guy like Davis when you’ve got a veteran like Blalock coming back? I’d like to argue that you can.
If we compare Davis and Blalock side by side, there aren’t really many good reasons to choose Blalock. Obviously he has more experience, but what kind of experience? He’s never played for a winning ball club, and over the last 18 months he has just 330 plate appearances. His health has become a major concern, and his career OPS is below .800, so even if he was healthy there’s no guarantee he would be very productive. In terms of pure stats, the argument against Blalock is even more convincing.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg4__ge4IYTPe55Yip2j-05s5NqHEkoyIslJPYihh9_1X2_Y7ExuAbdWK2GamVhwf3wzFk6EwHJcMX2zHd9Ys9JhoQyw5eY1SdnIceHE2N-RArLZSApfI4BoOv0OsKyNWH-bYTAI6rhGA8/s400/DavisBlalock.jpg)
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiIEd4SIPcafOpWXQq67X9_KZBqyFSmSOw-DCjZj-GXTPOz5BrNvhDa0S068AJ7EitAS5FY_2xtiMM8uBfbgpfMbwMxgPSbeAt_ubyu4xgzytCKHhgQ6SVreALAzpbMeik3E8gpBLkzi_M/s400/DavisBlalockLongoria.jpg)
So is there really any question as to what the Rangers should do? I don’t think there is, and I think the choice is obvious. Even if Blalock comes back and produces at his absolute best without any further injuries, he would still barely be able to compete with Davis. Meanwhile, Davis would be grinding it out in AAA where he has nothing left to prove, or he’d be losing valuable opportunities for improvement while sitting on the bench. The Rangers should either trade Blalock or juggle the defense to work everybody in, but if they are serious about winning (both now and in the future), they’ll keep Davis on the field.
...Read more
2 comments:
As a huge Chris Davis fan, I really hope that he is kept up in the major leagues and gets his share of playing time. I just love his power potential and his swing is so sweet. Though you've made some good points about Davis' production to justify him not getting sent back down to the minors, prospects as good as him have suffered such a fate in the name of maintaining arbitration years. Texas knows they don't have a chance this year, with a negative run differential, oakland still strong after the harden trade, LA playing phenomenally and the wildcard belonging to the yankees/detroit/boston/tampa bay. They'll option Davis back to the minors so they'll have him for longer, and for cheaper, in the future.
Thanks for the comment David. I think Davis is going to have a lot of huge fans once people realize his power potential. He really does have some amazing force in his swing, and he'll put up some amazing numbers in the future.
While it's true that some teams have kept prospects in the minors for financial reasons (it looks like that's what the Twins are doing with Francisco Liriano), it looks like the Rangers are keeping Davis in the majors for now as their starting first baseman. I think they realize that fans want to see Davis play, and he makes their team better with his bat.
Post a Comment